Arbok versus other technologies

In comparison with well known technologies the result can be seen in the table:

Required equipment

Multi-Stage Flash - MSF,

Multi-Effect Distillation - MED

Reverse Osmosis - RO

ARBOK™

Pumps

YES

YES

YES

Electric motors, drivers

YES

YES

NO

Membranes

YES

YES

NO

High pressure

YES

YES

NO

Catalysts

YES

YES

NO

Preclearing

YES

YES

NO

Additional clearing

YES

YES

NO

High temperature equipment

YES

NO

NO

Welcome in the new green desalinated tomorrow

How this all can be achieved?

The latest generation desalination unit has two chambers for the evaporation and for the condensation. A deep vacuum is created in both of the chambers using a vacuum pump.

The seawater or brine to be treated is fed directly into the evaporation chamber.

The feed water starts boiling in the evaporation chamber. Because of the low temperature of 4-6 degrees celsius, it is a cold boiling procedure.

In this chamber the water and the salt molecules are separated during inter-band transition cycle.

After the transition the vapor is transferred to the condensation chamber the generated steam concentrates and condensates into clean drinking water energy is recuperated into the evaporation chamber to intensify cold boiling process.
The result is a consumption ready, slightly mineralized, superior-quality soft potable water.

To assure the quality of the process various controllers and sensors regularely monitor the internal thermodynamic conditions in order to maximize evaporation and condensation intensity throughout the procedure.

Apart from water the only output is the solid salt which can be removed without interrupting the desalination process.

Recently the applied technologies are distributed as follows:

The RO ( Reverse Osmosis ) technology is the most common used one, that is why we also compared the two technologies separately. 

RO plant model

RO with Arbok brine solution

On average, 30-50% of the feed water is considered as brine in RO plants

Brine will be recycled, nearly doubling fresh water output

Economically seen there is no reason to increase the share of potable water within the viable technology

Arbok can supply devices directly to an RO plant, who can operate them by itself

The applied technologies can be compared upon the most imporant parameters:

Technology

Advantages

Limitations

Energy consumption

Arbok

Most energy/cost efficient

High fault tolerance

Modular

Emerging technology

( not well known )

Seawater: 0,65-0,8 kW/m3 with no salinity limit

Reverse Osmosis (RO)

Energy efficient

MOdular

Technical maturity

Limited salnity range ( <75.000 mg/L )

High fouling propensity

Seawater: 2-4 kWh/m3

Brackish water: 1,5-2,5 kWh/m3

Electrodialysis (ED/EDR)

High salinity limit ( > 100.000 mg/L )

Low fouling propensity

High energy consumption

Removes only charged contaminants

7-15 kWh/m3

Forward Osmosis (FO)

High salinity limit ( > 200.000 mg/L )

Low fouling propensity

Water flux lmitations

Emerging technology

21 kWh/m3

Membrane destillition (MD)

High salinity limit ( > 200.000 mg/L )

Low fouling propensity

Low water flux and recovery

Emerging technology

40 kWh/m3

Mechanical Vapor Compression (MVC)

High salinity limit ( > 200.000 mg/L )

Technical maturity

High energy consumption

HIgh capital

Not modular

20-35 kWh/m3

If we see the required equipment to operate the technologies, the situation is as follows:

Required equipment

Multi-Stage Flash - (MSF) 

Multi-Effect Distillation - (MED)

Reverse Osmosis - (RO)

Arbok

Pumps

Delivery pump

Circulation Pump

Pump for the high density environment

Network pumps

The multistage centrifugal pump

For some systems are pumps needed

Network pumps

Delivery pump

Circulation pump

Vacuum pump

Electric motors, drivers

Drive of pumps

Circulation drive

Drive for the pump of the brine

Engine of the network pump

3-phase high capacity engines with a high electric current

Drives for multistage centrifugal pump

Engine of the network pump

3-phase high capacity engines with a high electric current

NO or low power single-phase engine

Membranes

Big fraction membranes

Condensation membranes

Membranes of decrystallization

Membranes elements of nanofiltration

Membranes of primary clearing

NO

HIgh pressure

Pressure head cases

Pressure head cases

NO

Catalysts

Blocks inhibiton

Blocks of acceleration of reaction

Inhibition module

NO

Preclearing

Preclearing membranes

Preclearing cartridges

NO

Additional clearing

Block additional clearing

Block additional clearing 

Backterial lamps

NO

High temperature equipment

Filched heating and temperature stabilization

NO

NO

Reverse osmosis versus Arbok

The most common used desalination technology is the reverse osmosis ( RO ) which is a mature technology. It is a proven solution, well known, but is has limitations.

Main challenges are:

  • It has a reasonable energy consumption, but it is just too high. With the recent energy price level it OPEX is getting higher and higher.
  • Some tasks of purification ( desalination ) can not be solved only with RO. It should be applied either in too many steps or it should be integrated an other technology, like for example crystallization.
  • It does not matter how easy the task is, there will remain some concentrates ( called brine ) after he treatment. This should be disposed in addition.


An RO system is not difficult in it’s own way, the structure is logical, every unit has its own reason.
However, if we compare an RO plant and our Arbok system the difference is obvious.

Reverse osmosis

Arbok

The figures express the main differencies, and here is a table with the details:

PRODUCT/

SERVICE

RO

ARBOK

COMMENTS

Electricity consumption (NET)

3-7 kW / h

1 kW / h

-

The output of drinking water from the sea (in per cent)

30-50

± 96

-

Residue (brine) formation

30-50%

0

Disposal of brine is a complicated and expensive business, dumping brines back into the sea (as they did before) is prohibited. 

RO takes double amount of seawater and supply 50% of it to the water pipeline. The rest 50% it discharges back to the sea.

Arbok takes and desalinate 100% m3 of seawater.

The need for consumables

YES

NO

RO – costlier membranes and filters (they are not unified, purchased only from the equipment manufacturer or Chinese counterfeits). High cost, the need to stop production. The need for replacement and maintenance personnel.

Water quality

Water with high boron, requires additional mineralization, which is associated with additional costs and stoppages in the desalination process.

Drinkable slightly mineralized sterile  water with good consumption properties. No need for additional mineralization.

-

Salinity

up to 200,000 ppm/TDS

50,000 and up ppm/TDS

Arbok may desalinate any salinity of the seawater, including brine of any concentration rate

Operating pressure

up to 150 Bar

-1 Bar

Arbok is fully safe in operational mode.

RO requires protection.

Water temperature

up to 40 degrees C

up to 100 degrees C

-

Water quality precondition

The feedwater must be free of Fe3 and bacterial contaminations. Need a preserve.

The feedwater does NOT NEED TO be free of any heavy salt dissolved and bacterial/viral contaminations. No need any preserve.

-

Equipment cost (net cost)

6$ per 1 m3 per year production

5$ per 1 m3 per year production

The coefficient of equipment cost in relation to the annual volume of fresh water output is 6-7 for RO, Arbok - 4,5-5 (prices of 2022).

Permission to use

Most prohibited

Permitted

Arbok is totally friendly, safe and certified technology (EU CE)

Possibility of utilization of brines

NO

Brine discharges back to the sea, killing the environment.

Can utilize the brine obtained from RO with the production of drinking water and 8-9% of dissolved salt in brine in a dry form (technical dry salt as a market commodity)

-

The possibility of using the technology for cleaning other contaminants

YES

YES

-

The need for backup equipment

It is necessary to have a powerful backup power source in case of an emergency power outage plus the availability of a standard set of spare parts.

A standard set of spare parts is available only.

Arbok’s OPEX is 3 times less.

Arbok’s CAPEX is 1.5 times less in comparison to RO.

These are a lot points, and we can prove all of them.
Imagine, if Arbok has so many advantages toward the most applied technology how good it is.

Get more information